Elevated Mutation Rate during Meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

44Citations
Citations of this article
103Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Mutations accumulate during all stages of growth, but only germ line mutations contribute to evolution. While meiosis contributes to evolution by reassortment of parental alleles, we show here that the process itself is inherently mutagenic. We have previously shown that the DNA synthesis associated with repair of a double-strand break is about 1000-fold less accurate than S-phase synthesis. Since the process of meiosis involves many programmed DSBs, we reasoned that this repair might also be mutagenic. Indeed, in the early 1960′s Magni and Von Borstel observed elevated reversion of recessive alleles during meiosis, and found that the revertants were more likely to be associated with a crossover than non-revertants, a process that they called “the meiotic effect.” Here we use a forward mutation reporter (CAN1 HIS3) placed at either a meiotic recombination coldspot or hotspot near the MAT locus on Chromosome III. We find that the increased mutation rate at CAN1 (6 to 21 –fold) correlates with the underlying recombination rate at the locus. Importantly, we show that the elevated mutation rate is fully dependent upon Spo11, the protein that introduces the meiosis specific DSBs. To examine associated recombination we selected for random spores with or without a mutation in CAN1. We find that the mutations isolated this way show an increased association with recombination (crossovers, loss of crossover interference and/or increased gene conversion tracts). Polζ appears to contribute about half of the mutations induced during meiosis, but is not the only source of mutations for the meiotic effect. We see no difference in either the spectrum or distribution of mutations between mitosis and meiosis. The correlation of hotspots with elevated mutagenesis provides a mechanism for organisms to control evolution rates in a gene specific manner.

Figures

  • Fig. 1. Schematic of strains used in this study. A. Map of chromosome III showing the two different locations that the cassettes were inserted into (independently), as well as the location of markers used for crossover analysis and the distances between them. B. Strain GRY3629 that only has the outside flanking markers to determine genetic intervals in the absence of the construct. C. Strain GRY3262 bearing a hemizygous insertion of the HIS3 CAN1 cassette in the coldspot. D. GRY3263 bearing the substrate with homology to can1 at the coldspot. E. GRY3630 bearing the substrate with homology to can1 at the hotspot. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004910.g001
  • Table 1. Yeast strains.
  • Table 2. Mutation rate at the HIS3 CAN1 cassette in mitotic and meiotic cell divisions.
  • Table 4. Summary of mutation spectra for mitotic and meiotic cell divisions1.
  • Fig. 3. Crossover association among non-mutant (Cans) and mutant (Canr) spores. 1NCO: non crossover; 2#: number of events observed in each category; 3obs %: percent of total events observed (numbers in parentheses include double crossover events for the interval); 4exp%: percent of double crossover events expected based on genetic distance from observed total crossovers; 5NA: not applicable (since no events were observed). A. Spores from strains with the substrate in the coldspot were analyzed for crossovers in intervals ‘‘A’’ (natMX–HIS3), interval ‘‘B’’ (HIS3-MAT), and for double crossovers (crossovers in both interval A and interval B). Tetrads: data from tetrad analysis (Table 3), none of the spores from tetrad analysis had a mutation in CAN1. The expected double crossover frequency is based on the total number of observed crossovers in intervals A and B (numbers in parentheses). Random spores were classified as either His+Cans (nonmutant) or His+Canr (mutant). Canr/Cans is a comparison of the observed crossovers among the His+Canr random spores, divided by the observed crossovers among the His+Cans random spores. There are significantly more crossovers among the mutant spores. B. Spores from strains with the substrate in the hotspot were analyzed for crossovers in intervals ‘‘I’’ (natMX– MAT), ‘‘II’’ (MAT–HIS3), ‘‘III’’ (HIS3 – kanMX) as well as double and triple crossovers. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004910.g003

Cited by Powered by Scopus

591Citations
2074Readers
Get full text

Meiotic recombination: The essence of heredity

557Citations
604Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rattray, A., Santoyo, G., Shafer, B., & Strathern, J. N. (2015). Elevated Mutation Rate during Meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genetics, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004910

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 39

46%

Researcher 27

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 15

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57

63%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 32

35%

Philosophy 1

1%

Computer Science 1

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0