Treatment of surgical patients is evidence-based

23Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the type of evidence that supported our management of surgical patients. Design: Retrospective audit. Setting: Teaching hospital, Republic of Ireland. Patients: All 222 patients admitted by two surgical teams during one month. Patients admitted for diagnostic procedures were included if they were treated as a result. Main outcome measures: Diagnosis and treatment were established from the notes. Evidence for each intervention was then sought in MEDLINE 1986-1999, Best Evidence 1991-1999, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 3, 1999, and graded into one of five categories: Systematic review, meta-analysis, randomised controlled trial, prospective study, or retrospective study. Results: Treatment was supported by systematic review in 14, by meta-analysis in 12, by randomised controlled trial in 75, by prospective studies in 55, by retrospective studies in 58, and by no evidence in 8. Conclusions: Everyday surgical practice in our unit is supported by good quality evidence from recent publications.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kingston, R., Barry, M., Tierney, S., Drumm, J., & Grace, P. (2001). Treatment of surgical patients is evidence-based. European Journal of Surgery, 167(5), 324–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/110241501750215168

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free