Prisons or Problem-Solving: Does the Public Support Specialty Courts?

27Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recently, “problem-solving” courts have been developed as an alternative to imprisonment. They are often called “specialty” courts because they process and divert into treatment programs offenders who are seen as different from the general criminal population, such as those with mental health or drug problems, those who are homeless or veterans, and those who engage in domestic violence. Based on a 2017 national survey of 1,000 respondents, the current study examines overall public support for rehabilitation as a goal of corrections and then focuses specifically on support for different types of specialty courts. The analysis reveals that the American public endorses not only the rehabilitative ideal but also the use of problem-solving courts. Further, with only minimal variation, strong support for these courts appears to exist regardless of political orientation and sociodemographic characteristics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thielo, A. J., Cullen, F. T., Burton, A. L., Moon, M. M., & Burton, V. S. (2019). Prisons or Problem-Solving: Does the Public Support Specialty Courts? Victims and Offenders, 14(3), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2019.1595243

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free