Orbital floor fractures - short- and intermediate-term complications depending on treatment procedures

20Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Many reconstruction materials for orbital floor fractures have been described in the past including autologous bone transplants, resorbable polymers and titan meshes. So far evidence is missing which material is used successfully regarding indication and particular size of defect. Therefore the aim of this study was to evaluate which reconstruction technique produces best clinical outcome and least complications associated with indication. Methods: Retrospectively, surgical and ophthalmological data plus CT scans from a collective of 775 patients between 2005 and 2012 were analyzed. Furthermore included patients were sounded on satisfaction and potential problems postoperatively. Results: Overall 593 patients offered full pre- and postoperative short-time data appropriate to inclusion criteria - of these 507 (85,5 %) underwent primary surgical treatment. Smallest average defect size was found in cases with no indication for surgical treatment (81 mm2), largest in cases indicating titanium mesh reconstruction (601.5 mm2). In 15 cases exact fragment reposition was possible without insertion of alloplastic material. Best clinical results obtained reconstruction using polydioxanone foil (PDS). 0.15 mm PDS-foil: 444 patients, reduced diplopia pre to postoperative 16 to 6 % (p < 0.01), ex- and enophthalmus < 2 % after surgery. 0.25 mm PDS-foil: 26 patients, reduced diplopia from pre- to postoperative 34,6 to 3,8 % (p < 0.01), postoperative exophthalmus rate was higher than preoperative (3,8 to 7,7 %). In comparison to reconstruction with PDS-foil a higher percentage of patients reconstructed with titanium meshes (n = 22) revealed no significant reduction of diplopia (45,5 to 31,8 %; p = 0.07). Furthermore 63 of all included patients agreed to complete a questionnaire on intermediate-term postoperative symptoms and surgical contentedness. Remarkably 50 % of the patients reconstructed with titanium meshes indicated foreign body sensations and cold feeling in the long-term. Conclusions: Short- and intermediate-term results of clinical outcome in our patients with surgical treated orbital floor fractures (i.e. diplopia, en- or exophthalmus) reveal that thin resorbable foils, particularly 0.15 mm diameter PDS-foil seem to generate best results referring to orbital floor defects with a size of 250 to 300 mm2. Trial registration: Study number 4222, year 2013, ethics committee of the medical faculty of the Heinrich Heine university of Duesseldorf.

References Powered by Scopus

Assessment of internal orbital reconstructions for pure blowout fractures: Cranial bone grafts versus titanium mesh

209Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Orbital floor reconstruction with an alloplastic resorbable polydioxanone sheet

117Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analysis of facial bone fractures: An 11-year study of 2,094 patients

113Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Targeting Local Osteogenic and Ancillary Cells by Mechanobiologically Optimized Magnesium Scaffolds for Orbital Bone Reconstruction in Canines

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Use of bioresorbable implants for orbital fracture reconstruction

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Polydioxanone plates are safe and effective for L-strut support in functional septorhinoplasty

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Holtmann, H., Eren, H., Sander, K., Kübler, N. R., & Handschel, J. (2016). Orbital floor fractures - short- and intermediate-term complications depending on treatment procedures. Head and Face Medicine, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-015-0096-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

63%

Researcher 8

23%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 28

82%

Materials Science 2

6%

Social Sciences 2

6%

Engineering 2

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 54

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free