A qualitative study on barriers and enablers to uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening by people with diabetes in the Western Province of Sri Lanka

21Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Blindness and visual impairment from diabetic retinopathy (DR) are avoidable through early detection and timely treatment. The Western Province of Sri Lanka has the highest prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) (18.6%) in the country. A situational analysis identified a significant gap in DR screening services (DRSS) uptake in this region. Barriers that hinder people with DM (PwDM) from attending DRSS are poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to understand the factors which influence the uptake of DRSS and follow-up to inform health promotion strategies and improve the uptake of these services. Methods: Eleven focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with PwDM who presented to medical, general eye and vitreoretinal services in three public sector institutions (two tertiary and one secondary level) in the Western Province between October 2016 and March 2017. We enrolled six groups (four Sinhala speaking, two Tamil) of women and five groups (three Sinhala and two Tamil) of men representing ethnicity and gender. We performed a thematic analysis and described the main themes and subthemes using the socio-ecological model as a framework. Results: We identified lack of knowledge of both the condition and the need for screening as key barriers to access DRSS. Socio-cultural factors in the family environment, economic reasons and institutional factors were also important barriers. Additional reasons include long waiting time at eye clinics and poor referrals exacerbated by the lack of a systematic DRSS. In addition, attitudes to DRSS such as fear of discomfort from the procedure and the need for accompaniment following mydriasis were also deterrents to follow-up screening. Conclusion: This study has shown that there are inter-related user, family, and institutional factors which affect the uptake of DRSS. Understanding how DR is conceptualised by PwDM in this region is essential to refine strategies to improve access to DRSS. Strategies to improve knowledge need to be more culturally acceptable and relevant to PwDM and their families, with increased availability of DRSS at convenient locations may increase timely uptake of screening.

References Powered by Scopus

The Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes on the Development and Progression of Long-Term Complications in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

0
24016Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The concept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction

2313Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patient-centred access to health care: Conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations

1942Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patient and provider perspectives on barriers to screening for diabetic retinopathy: An exploratory study from southern India

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Barriers and facilitators to diabetic retinopathy screening within Australian primary care

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Piyasena, M. M. P. N., Murthy, G. V. S., Yip, J. L. Y., Gilbert, C., Peto, T., Premarathna, M., & Zuurmond, M. (2019). A qualitative study on barriers and enablers to uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening by people with diabetes in the Western Province of Sri Lanka. Tropical Medicine and Health, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-019-0160-y

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

56%

Researcher 10

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 31

54%

Nursing and Health Professions 15

26%

Social Sciences 9

16%

Engineering 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free