Temporal Estimation of Major News Events: Re-examining the Accessibility Principle

18Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The way in which people estimate when an event occurred and the accuracy of their estimates are of concern both to psychologists interested in the structure of event memory and to other researchers who, for a variety of reasons, rely on the accuracy of people's temporal estimates. Over 2,000 subjects were asked to say when two major news events, Thatcher's resignation and the Hillsborough football disaster, happened. By embedding the questions in a face-to-face survey we hoped to maximize the probability of subjects using a relatively simple estimation heuristic, previously described as the accessibility principle. This predicts that underestimation of elapsed time should be associated with clearer memories. This hypothesis was not corroborated. We discuss which aspects of the accessibility principle can be retained.

References Powered by Scopus

Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys

1593Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Answering autobiographical questions: The impact of memory and inference on surveys

922Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Memory for the time of past events

500Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Time in autobiographical memory

140Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Memory for time: How people date events

119Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Young children's references to temporal attributes of allegedly experienced events in the course of forensic interviews

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wright, D. B., Gaskell, G. D., & O’Muircheartaigh, C. A. (1997). Temporal Estimation of Major News Events: Re-examining the Accessibility Principle. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199702)11:1<35::AID-ACP420>3.0.CO;2-R

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

62%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

15%

Researcher 2

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 7

54%

Social Sciences 4

31%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

8%

Sports and Recreations 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free