Diagnostic performance of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value in differentiating the invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ

6Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: This study is to explore the role of the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC-min) value in the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Materials and Methods: A total of 196 breast cancer patients with pathologically verified lesions were included. They received diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging before the pathological confirmation. The ADC-min value and its relationship with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), IDC-DCIS, and DCIS were analyzed. Results: Of the 196 breast cancer patients, there were 115 (58.67%) cases of IDC, 53 (27.04%) cases of IDC-DCIS, and 28 (14.29%) cases of DCIS. The mean ADC-min values for IDC, IDC-DCIS, and DCIS were (0.96 ± 0.16) × 10-3, (1.10 ± 0.13) × 10-3, and (1.24 ± 0.17) × 10-3 mm 2/s, respectively. The mean ADC-min value of IDC was significantly lower than that of IDC-DCIS and that of IDC-DCIS was significantly lower than that of DCIS (P < 0.01). The mean ADC-min value was also significantly different between invasive cancer and DCIS (P < 0.01). The mean ADC-min value can be used in the differential diagnosis of DCIS, with a cutoff point of 1.02 × 10-3 mm 2/s (sensitivity of 92.9% and specificity of 57.7%). Conclusions: The ADC-min values are significantly different among IDC, IDC-DCIS, and DCIS, with the lowest ADC-min values in IDC, followed by IDC-DCIS and DCIS. The ADC-min maybe used as a promising parameter to differentiate DCIS and invasive cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhao, S., Shao, G., Chen, P., Li, L., Yang, Y., Zhao, X., & Guo, W. (2019). Diagnostic performance of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value in differentiating the invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 15(4), 871–875. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_607_18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free