Educational technologies and practices for prevention of vertical HIV transmission

5Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to assess available evidence on educational technologies and practices for prevention of vertical HIV transmission. METHOD: LILACS, PubMed, Scopus, BDENF, between April and May 2016, with the descriptors: "Vertical Transmission of Infectious Disease", "HIV", "Health Education" and "Technology". RESULTS: there are 16 articles published between 2000 and 2014, mostly Brazilian and African, Cross-sectional and with low level of evidence. The studies covered the use of hard technologies, through video, radio and telephone, and soft, emphasizing, in particular, counseling. CONCLUSION: the studies recognize the importance of educational activities as a tool for health promotion in the context of vertical HIV transmission, despite reporting the need for constant training of professionals and urgency in the renewal of educational concepts and practices. Therefore, it is recommended to expand and consolidate health counseling and emphasize the role of nurses as an important actor in this setting.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Construction and validation of educational material for the health promotion of individuals with HIV

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Health education in the Family health strategy: nurses’ perception

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Booklet for knowledge and prevention of HIV mother-to-child transmission: a pilot study of a randomized clinical trial

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lima, A. C. M. A. C. C., Bezerra, K. de C., Sousa, D. M. do N., Vasconcelos, C. T. M., Coutinho, J. F. V., & Oriá, M. O. B. (2018). Educational technologies and practices for prevention of vertical HIV transmission. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0333

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

79%

Researcher 3

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 22

71%

Social Sciences 5

16%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

6%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free