Computerized systems supporting clinical decision in medicine

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Statistics is the science of collection, summarizing, presentation and interpretation of data. Moreover, it yields methods used in the verification of research hypotheses. The presence of a statistician in a research group remarkably improves both the quality of design and research and the optimization of financial resources. Moreover, the involvement of a statistician in a research team helps the physician to effectively utilize the time and energy spent on diagnosing, which is an important aspect in view of limited healthcare resources. Precise, properly designed and implemented Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems certainly lead to the improvement of healthcare and the quality of medical services, which increases patient satisfaction and reduces financial burdens on healthcare systems.

References Powered by Scopus

Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review

2456Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: A systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success

2065Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure: Classification and regression tree analysis

1448Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Role of a digital clinical decision–support system in general practitioners’ management of copd in Norway

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Owczarek, A. J., Smertka, M., Jȩdrusik, P., Gȩbska-Kuczerowska, A., Chudek, J., & Wojnicz, R. (2018). Computerized systems supporting clinical decision in medicine. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 56(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0044

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

80%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free