YouTube, children, and collaborative culture. A literature reviews

39Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify empirical insights through a summary of the evidence-based knowledge on young youtubers. Taking a participatory culture perspective, a systematic review has been conducted of 65 academic papers published since 2008. The article condenses existing findings on young youtubers practices, motivation for using YouTube, type of YouTube content, and parental intermediation, as well as legal, regulatory, and educational aspects in need of attention. Also addressed are the marketing strategies used by brands on YouTube and their effects on young audiences. The implications of the young youtuber phenomenon are considered, as well as necessary lines of future research.

References Powered by Scopus

Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1

7653Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter?

708Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean college students

668Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Influential children on YouTube and Instagram: Content and presence of brands during confinement

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Parents' and children's perception on social media advertising

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The relationship of chilean minors with brands and influencers on social networks

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tur-Viñes, V., Núñez-Gómez, P., & Martínez-Pastor, E. (2019). YouTube, children, and collaborative culture. A literature reviews. Historia y Comunicacion Social. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://doi.org/10.5209/HICS.64498

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

29%

Researcher 2

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 8

62%

Computer Science 2

15%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

15%

Design 1

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0