Using deep autoencoders to identify abnormal brain structural patterns in neuropsychiatric disorders: A large-scale multi-sample study

88Citations
Citations of this article
199Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Machine learning is becoming an increasingly popular approach for investigating spatially distributed and subtle neuroanatomical alterations in brain-based disorders. However, some machine learning models have been criticized for requiring a large number of cases in each experimental group, and for resembling a “black box” that provides little or no insight into the nature of the data. In this article, we propose an alternative conceptual and practical approach for investigating brain-based disorders which aim to overcome these limitations. We used an artificial neural network known as “deep autoencoder” to create a normative model using structural magnetic resonance imaging data from 1,113 healthy people. We then used this model to estimate total and regional neuroanatomical deviation in individual patients with schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder using two independent data sets (n = 263). We report that the model was able to generate different values of total neuroanatomical deviation for each disease under investigation relative to their control group (p

References Powered by Scopus

64051Citations
45361Readers
Get full text
46029Citations
8786Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text
213Citations
665Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pinaya, W. H. L., Mechelli, A., & Sato, J. R. (2019). Using deep autoencoders to identify abnormal brain structural patterns in neuropsychiatric disorders: A large-scale multi-sample study. Human Brain Mapping, 40(3), 944–954. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24423

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 60

62%

Researcher 28

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 27

36%

Engineering 18

24%

Neuroscience 16

21%

Medicine and Dentistry 14

19%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 72

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0