Financial development and economic growth: The case of Pakistan

64Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between financial depth and economic growth is examined in an Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) framework for Pakistan utilising annual data for the period 1971-2004. The main empirical findings suggest that both in the long and the short run, financial depth exerted a positive effect on economic growth. The findings also suggest that in the long run, real interest rate had a significant and positive effect on economic growth. However, the short-run response of the real interest rate is very low, suggesting further acceleration of the liberalisation process.

References Powered by Scopus

On the mechanics of economic development

12063Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships

11504Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Finance and growth: schumpeter might be right

4210Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia

592Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Linking financial development, economic growth and energy consumption in Pakistan

295Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Natural resources as blessings and finance-growth nexus: A bootstrap ARDL approach in an emerging economy

159Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khan, M. A., Qayyum, A., & Sheikh, S. A. (2005). Financial development and economic growth: The case of Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review, 44(4 PART II), 819–835. https://doi.org/10.30541/v44i4iipp.819-837

Readers over time

‘10‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 45

65%

Lecturer / Post doc 11

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

10%

Researcher 6

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 40

60%

Business, Management and Accounting 24

36%

Mathematics 2

3%

Energy 1

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0