A Framework for Using Consequential Validity Evidence in Evaluating Large-Scale Writing Assessments: A Canadian Study

  • Slomp D
  • Corrigan J
  • Sugimoto T
4Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The increasing diversity of students in contemporary classrooms and the concomitant increase in large-scale testing programs highlight the importance of developing writing assessment programs that are sensitive to the challenges of assessing diverse populations. To this end, this article provides a framework for conducting consequential validity research on large-scale writing assessment programs. It illustrates this validity model through a series of instrumental case studies drawing on the research literature conducted on writing assessment programs in Canada. The authors derived the cases from a systematic review of the literature published between January 2000 and December 2012 that directly examined the consequences of large-scale writing assessment on writing instruction in Canadian schools. They argue that, this model of constructing consequential validity research provides researchers, test developers, and test users with a clearer, more systematic approach to examining the effects of assessment on diverse populations of students. They also argue that, this model will enable the development of stronger, more integrated validity arguments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Slomp, D. H., Corrigan, J. A., & Sugimoto, T. (2014). A Framework for Using Consequential Validity Evidence in Evaluating Large-Scale Writing Assessments: A Canadian Study. Source: Research in the Teaching of English, 48(3), 276–302. https://doi.org/S0013468618306868

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free