4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

While acknowledging Wright’s competent handling of a wide range of primary sources, this response takes issue with his conclusions by arguing that the bodily resurrection did not happen and that the Gospel accounts are legendary and at times contradictory. It is also argued that there are two distinct traditions of under- standing the resurrection in earliest Christianity, i.e. a more ‘spiritual’ transforma- tion associated with the Jerusalem church and the bodily resurrection associated with the Pauline churches and represented in narrative form in Mk 16.1-8. This response is divided into the following main areas: ideas of post-mortal life in Judaism; 1 Corinthians 15; the Gospel narratives; and conversion-visions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goulder, M. (2005). Jesus’ resurrection and Christian origins: A response to N.T. Wright. Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476869005058195

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free