On the Ground Ecological site descriptions and state-and-transition models are national-level tools for organizing and delivering information about landscape dynamics and management. Recent papers criticized state-and-transition models because they overemphasize grazing, are inconsistently presented, and do not address climate change. I argue that the analysis of Twidwell et al. does not support an overemphasis on grazing, that inconsistent presentation is a necessary consequence of early model development efforts and immature science concepts, and that climate change effects should not be addressed in site-level models without evidence. Improving these important tools requires fair critique, but also the strong commitment of scientists and funders.
CITATION STYLE
Bestelmeyer, B. T. (2015). National assessment and critiques of state-and-transition models: The baby with the bathwater. Rangelands, 37(3), 125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rala.2015.03.004
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.