Oral immunization with urease and Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin is safe and immunogenic in Helicobacter pylori-infected adults

282Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background and Aims: Oral immunization with Helicobacter pylori urease can cure Helicobacter infection in animals. As a step toward therapeutic immunization in humans, the safety and immunogenicity of oral immunization with recombinant H. pylori urease were tested in H. pylori-infected adults. Methods: Twenty-six H. pylori-infected volunteers were randomized in a double-blind study to four weekly oral doses of 180, 60, or 20 mg of urease with 5 μg heat-labile enterotoxin of Escherichia coli (LT), LT alone, or placebo. Side effects and immune responses were evaluated weekly after immunization, and gastric biopsy specimens were obtained after 1 month and 6 months for histology and quantitative cultures. Results: Diarrhea was noted in 16 of 24 (66%) of the volunteers who completed the study. Antiurease serum immunoglobulin A titers increased 1.58-fold ± 0.37-fold and 3.66-fold ± 1.5-fold (mean ± SEM) after immunization with 60 and 180 mg urease, respectively, whereas no change occurred in the placebo ± LT groups (P = 0.005). Circulating antiurease immunoglobulin A-producing cells increased in volunteers exposed to urease compared with placebo (38.9 ± 13.6/106 vs. 5.4 ± 3.1; P = 0.018). Eradication of H. pylori infection was not observed, but urease immunization induced a significant decrease in gastric H. pylori density. Conclusions: H. pylori urease with LT is well tolerated and immunogenic in H. pylori-infected individuals. An improved vaccine formulation may induce curative immunity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Michetti, P., Kreiss, C., Kotloff, K. L., Porta, N., Blanco, J. L., Bachmann, D., … Blum, A. L. (1999). Oral immunization with urease and Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin is safe and immunogenic in Helicobacter pylori-infected adults. Gastroenterology, 116(4), 804–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70063-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free