Prophylactic antibiotic treatment is superior to therapy on-demand in experimental necrotising pancreatitis

  • S. F
  • W. H
  • R. L
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: High morbidity and mortality rates in patients with severe acute pancreatitis are mainly caused by bacterial superinfection of pancreatic necrosis and subsequent sepsis. The benefit of early prophylactic antibiotics remains controversial because clinical studies performed to date were statistically underpowered. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate on-demand versus prophylactic antibiotic treatment in a standardised experimental model. Methods: Treatment groups received meropenem either therapeutically 24 hours after induction of necrotising pancreatitis or prophylactically before development of pancreatic superinfection. At 24 and 72 hours, pancreatic injury was investigated by histology and translocation by bacterial cultures of pancreatic tissue and mesenteric lymph nodes. Septic complications were evaluated by blood cultures and survival. Results: Without antibiotic treatment, pancreatic superinfection was observed in almost all cases after induction of necrotising pancreatitis. The 72-hour-mortality rate was 42.9\% and bacterial infection of mesenteric lymph nodes and bacteraemia was found in 87.5\% of the surviving animals. Therapeutic administration of meropenem on-demand reduced bacteraemia to 50\% and mortality to 27.3\%. However, prophylactic antibiotic treatment significantly reduced bacteraemia to 25.0\% (p = 0.04) and pancreatic superinfection as well as mortality to 0\% (p < 0.001 and p = 0.05, respectively) compared with controls. Conclusions: In the present study both prophylactic and delayed antibiotic treatment on-demand reduced septic complications in a standardised setting of experimental necrotising pancreatitis. However, pancreatic superinfection, bacteraemia and mortality rates were reduced significantly by early treatment. Thus, in the absence of statistically relevant and well-designed clinical trials, the study demonstrates that prophylactic antibiotic treatment is superior to antibiotic treatment on-demand. ©2008 Fritz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

S., F., W., H., R., L., K., W.-S., M., K., T., H., … J., W. (2008). Prophylactic antibiotic treatment is superior to therapy on-demand in experimental necrotising pancreatitis. Critical Care, 12(6). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7118

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free