Radiotherapy or surgery for spine metastases?

12Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy (RT) remains the cornerstone of management of spine metastases (SM), even though surgery is a well-established treatment for selected patients. We compared the use of RT and surgery in a population-based cohort of patients with SM, investigated pre-treatment factors that were associated with use of these treatment modalities, and examined survival.<br /><br />PATIENTS AND METHODS: 903 patients in the south-eastern Norway who were admitted for RT or surgery for SM for the first time during an 18-month period in 2007-2008 were identified and their medical records were reviewed.<br /><br />RESULTS: The primary treatment was surgery in 58 patients and RT in 845 patients, including 704 multiple-fraction (MF) and 141 single-fraction (SF) RT schedules. 11 of 607 patients without motor impairment (2%) and 47 of 274 patients with motor impairment (17%) underwent primary operations. 11 of 58 operated patients and 244 of 845 irradiated patients died within 2 months after the start of treatment. 26% of those who received multiple-fraction RT or surgery died within 2 months.<br /><br />INTERPRETATION: Motor impairment was the main indication for surgery. Better identification of patients with short survival is needed to avoid time-consuming treatment (major surgery and long-term RT).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zaikova, O., Fosså, S. D., Bruland, Ø. S., Giercksky, K. E., Sandstad, B., & Skjeldal, S. (2011). Radiotherapy or surgery for spine metastases? Acta Orthopaedica, 82(3), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.566142

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free