Regulating against business “fronting” to advance black economic empowerment in Zimbabwe: Lessons from South Africa

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article examines Zimbabwe’s indigenisation legislation, points out some of its inadequacies and draws lessons from South Africa’s experiences in implementing its own indigenisation legislation. Both countries have encountered challenges relating to an upsurge in unethical business conduct aimed at defeating the objectives of their black economic empowerment programmes, policies and legislation. This practice is called business fronting. However, while South Africa has succeeded in enacting a credible piece of legislation aimed at addressing this issue, Zimbabwe has yet to do so. The article points out that the failure to regulate against business fronting poses the most significant threat to the attainment of the laudable aims and objectives of the indigenisation programme and related legislation. In order to avoid becoming a regulatory regime that is notorious for not only being functionally ineffective but also for tacitly permitting racketeering in reality, the article argues for the adoption of anti-fronting legislation in Zimbabwe using the South African legislation as a model.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Warikandwa, T. V., & Osode, P. C. (2017). Regulating against business “fronting” to advance black economic empowerment in Zimbabwe: Lessons from South Africa. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 20. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2017/v20n0a735

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free