Treatment Failure Among Infected Periprosthetic Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients

  • Schwarzkopf R
  • Mikhael B
  • Wright E
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Two-stage revision has been shown to be the most successful treatment in eradicating deep infection following total hiparthroplasty. We identified 62 patients treated by a two-stage revision. We defined “successful revision” as negative intraoperative cultures and no further infection-related procedure. We defined “eradication of infection” on the basis of negative cultures and clinical diagnosis at least one year after 2 nd stage procedure. After a mean follow up of 2.7 years, eradication of the infection was documented in 91.1%, and a successful two-stage revision in 85.7% of patients. We observed no association between higher pre-reimplantation levels of ESR and C-reactive protein and lower likelihood of successful two-stage revision. We found an association between a history of another previous infected prosthetic joint and a failed 2 nd stage procedure. Failure to achieve eradication of infection and successful two-stage revision occurs infrequently. Patients with prior history of a previous prosthetic joint infection are at higher risk of failure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schwarzkopf, R., Mikhael, B., Wright, E., Estok, D. M., & Katz, J. N. (2014). Treatment Failure Among Infected Periprosthetic Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients. The Open Orthopaedics Journal, 8(1), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325020140515002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free