Variations in risk assessment models may contribute to the existing gap between venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines and adherence

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Risk assessment models (RAMs) may allow the clinician to determine need for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis. Individual healthcare facilities often develop their own RAMs. The purpose of this study was to determine: 1.) inter-RAM variability in DVT risk factors and contraindications; 2.) inter-rater variability and inter-RAM variability when applying a RAM to a standard case; and 3.) inter-rater and inter-RAM variability in outcome as far as type of prophylaxis. A convenience sample of RAMs was obtained from various institutions and ten reviewers were recruited to apply the RAMs to three patient cases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vyas, D. (2012). Variations in risk assessment models may contribute to the existing gap between venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines and adherence. SpringerPlus. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-1-60

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free