Atoms, complexes, and demonstration: Posterior analytics 96b15-25

  • Goldin O
  • 4

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 2

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

There is agreement neither concerning the point that is being made in Posterior analytics 96b15-25 nor the issue Aristotle intends to address. There are two major lines of interpretation of this passage. According to one, sketched by Themistius and developed by Philoponus and Eustratius, Aristotle is primarily concerned with determining the definitions of the infimae species that fall under a certain genus. They understand Aristotle as arguing that this requires collating definitional predictions, seeing which are common to which species. Pacius, on the other hand, takes Aristotle to be saying that a genus is studied scientifically through first determining the infimae species that fall under that genus. This interpretation attributes to Aristotle a distinction between primary and derivative subjects. I argue for Pacius's interpretation, defending it against Barnes's objections. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Aristotle
  • Definition
  • Demonstration
  • Principles
  • Species

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Owen Goldin

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free