10Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: Compare GFR estimates (eGFR) calculated by formulas (CG, CGI, MDRD) and creatinine clearance (CrCl), in subgroups based on sex, age, BMI and serum creatinine (Cr). Design and methods: eGFR is calculated with Cockgroft-Gault (CG), CG corrected for ideal or lean weight (CGI), and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulas using a compensated kinetic Jaffé method. Comparison of means and correlations relative to CrCl is done with 666 male and female adult subjects in different subgroups. Results: Comparatively to CrCl, most subgroups are best correlated with MDRD, especially with high Cr. However, in men < 65 years, a factor of 222, instead of 186 in MDRD formula, is better. Conclusions: eGFR from MDRD formula, modified for men < 65 years, is better correlated to CrCl. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Planet, G. (2007). Comparison of creatinine clearance estimates with routine measured clearance. Clinical Biochemistry, 40(1–2), 124–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2006.08.001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free