Decision weights in anticipated utility theory. Response to Segal

Citations of this article
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text


The Anticipated Utility model permits the incorporation of decision weights into a model of choice under uncertainty which maintains the desirable properties of transitivity and preservation of dominance. In order to model choice it is necessary to impose appropriate conditions on the decision weighting function. Segal has argued that the function should be concave so that less favorable outcomes are always given more weight than the favorable ones. In this paper it is argued that outlying low probability events, whether favorable or unfavorable, are likely to be 'overweighted'. © 1987.




Quiggin, J. (1987). Decision weights in anticipated utility theory. Response to Segal. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 8(4), 641–645.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free