α-Bungarotoxin binding sites in rat hippocampal and cortical cultures: initial characterisation, colocalisation with α7 subunits and up-regulation by chronic nicotine treatment

108Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

High density neuronal cultures from rat E18 hippocampus and cortex have been characterised with respect to cholinergic binding sites. No specific binding of [3H]nicotine or [3H]cyttine to live cells in situ was detected, although the limit for detection was estimated to be 30 fmol/mg protein. Muscarinic binding sites labelled with [3H]QNB were present at a density of 0.75 pmol/mg protein. [125I]α-Bungarotoxin (αBgt) bound to hippocampal cultures with a Bmax of 128 fmol/mg protein and a Kd of 0.6 nM; cortical cultures expressed five times fewer [125I]α-Bgt binding sites. Fluorescence cytochemistry with rhodamine-α-Bgt indicated that 95% of hippocampal neurons were labelled, compared with only 36% of cortical neurons. Average densities of 4 × 104 and 2 × 104 binding sites/cell were calculated for hippocampal and cortical cultures, respectively. Double labelling experiments with mAb307 (which recognises the rat α7 nicotinic receptor subunit) and rhodamine-α-Bgt gave coincident labelling patterns, supporting the correlation between the α7 subunit and Bgt-sensitive neuronal nicotinic receptor. Treatment of hippocampal cultures with 10 μM nicotine for 14 days elicited a 40% increase in the numbers of [125I]α-Bgt binding sites, mimicking the up-regulation observed in vivo studies. Primary cultures offer a useful in in vitro system for investigating the expression and regulation of brain α-Bgt-sensitive receptors. © 1995.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barrantes, G. E., Rogers, A. T., Lindstrom, J., & Wonnacott, S. (1995). α-Bungarotoxin binding sites in rat hippocampal and cortical cultures: initial characterisation, colocalisation with α7 subunits and up-regulation by chronic nicotine treatment. Brain Research, 672(1–2), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(94)01386-V

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free