Abstraction and four kinds of invariance (Or: What's so logical about counting)

4Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Fine and Antonelli introduce two generalizations of permutation invariance - internal invariance and simple/double invariance respectively. After sketching reasons why a solution to the Bad Company problem might require that abstraction principles be invariant in one or both senses, I identify the most finegrained abstraction principle that is invariant in each sense. Hume's Principle is the most fine-grained abstraction principle invariant in both senses. I conclude by suggesting that this partially explains the success of Hume's Principle, and the comparative lack of success in reconstructing areas of mathematics other than arithmetic based on non-invariant abstraction principles.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cook, R. T. (2017). Abstraction and four kinds of invariance (Or: What’s so logical about counting). Philosophia Mathematica, 25(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nkw014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free