Activity traps and the corer: Complementary methods for sampling aquatic invertebrates

25Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We compared the picture of aquatic invertebrate fauna given by three types of sampling methods: the corer as well as bottom and mid-water activity traps. The corer mainly caught benthic animals (89%), the most numerous groups of which were chironomids and sphaerids. Nekton was more abundant in activity traps (77% in bottom and 63% in mid-water), the most numerous groups were Cladocera and water mites. The size distributions in catch of the corer and the activity traps differed but there was no difference between the two types of activity traps. In activity traps, individuals of the smallest size class were most abundant, wheras animals of the second smallest size class were most numerous in the corer. We suggest that activity traps and the corer could be used as complementary methods to sample aquatic invertebrate communities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hyvönen, T., & Nummi, P. (2000). Activity traps and the corer: Complementary methods for sampling aquatic invertebrates. Hydrobiologia, 432(1–3), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004038707992

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free