Skip to content
Journal article

Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research

Opdenakker R ...see all

Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, vol. 7, issue 4 (2006)

  • 593


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • Citations

    Citations of this article.
  • Views

    ScienceDirect users who have downloaded this article.
Sign in to save reference


Face-to-face interviews have long been the dominant interview technique in the field of qualitative research. In the last two decades, telephone interviewing became more and more common. Due to the explosive growth of new communication forms, such as computer mediated communication (for example e-mail and chat boxes), other interview techniques can be introduced and used within the field of qualitative research. For a study in the domain of virtual teams, I used various communication possibilities to interview informants as well as face-to-face interviews. In this article a comparison will be made concerning the advantages and disadvantages of face-to-face, telephone, e-mail and MSN messenger interviews. By including telephone and MSN messenger interviews in the comparison, the scope of this article is broader than the article of BAMPTON and COWTON (2002). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Author-supplied keywords

  • Computer mediated communication (CMC)
  • E-mail interview
  • Face-to-face interview
  • Interviews
  • MSN messenger interview
  • Telephone interview

Find this document

Get full text


  • Raymond Opdenakker

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below