Lawton’s contingency thesis (CT) states that there are no useful generalizations (“laws”) at the level of ecological communities because these systems are especially prone to contingent historical events. I argue that this influential thesis has been grounded on the wrong kind of evidence. CT is best understood in Woodward’s terms as a claim about the instability of certain causal dependencies across different background conditions. A recent distinction between evolution and ecology reveals what an adequate test of Lawton’s thesis would look like. To date, CT remains untested. But developments in genome-level ecology and molecular ecology point in promising directions.
CITATION STYLE
Linquist, S. (2015). Against Lawton’s contingency thesis; or, why the reported demise of community ecology is greatly exaggerated. Philosophy of Science, 82(5), 1104–1115. https://doi.org/10.1086/684024
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.