Alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards: Principals' perceptions

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To improve teaching and assessment for students with themost significant cognitive disabilities and to truly ensure that state accountability systems address the performance of these students, a better understanding of the instructional effects of accountability systems as perceived by school leaders (i.e., principals) is critically important. This study was designed to examine two exploratory research questions related to principals' perceptions of the alternate assessment based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAS) in two states; specifically, (a) What were principals' overall perceptions of the influence of the AA-AAS on teachers' daily instruction; and (b) Were there meaningful differences in perceptions between principals from State 1 and State 2? Findings across the two states were similar and, overall, the principals' perceptions of the AA-AAS in their respective states were positive. Future research considerations and implications for practitioners are discussed. © 2009 by TASH.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Towles-Reeves, E., Kleinert, H., & Anderman, L. (2008). Alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards: Principals’ perceptions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33(3), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.33.3.122

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free