Anthropological studies of national reconciliation processes

  • Wilson R
  • 57


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 48


    Citations of this article.


This article examines how social researchers have evaluated the rise of institutions to create ‘national reconciliation’ in countries emerging from authoritarianism and state repression. Reconciliation has been counter-posed to retributive justice by new political and religious elites, who have instead sought to construct a new notion of the national self and psyche, and in so doing used organic models of state and society and metaphors of illness and health in the body politic. Intellectuals such as the legal scholar Minow have applauded these efforts as attempts to transcend the limitations of law and legal discourse in order to construct a different kind of public space and collective memory, and to engage in emotional and psychological healing. Anthropologists have taken a more mixed and critical view. Some such as Buur and Ross have asserted that truth commissions are not free of the positivism which characterizes the legal process and which excludes certain types of voice and subjectivity and creates silences of its own. Others such as Borneman and Wilson have criticized reconciliation strategies for undermining the rule of law and they have asserted that democratizing regimes must instead attempt to rebuild accountability, and thereby state legitimacy, through retributive justice.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Anthropology of human rights
  • Political violence
  • Reconciliation
  • Retributive justice
  • Transitional justice
  • Truth commissions

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Richard Ashby Wilson

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free