'Too Asian?' On racism, paradox and ethno-nationalism

22Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This essay examines the controversial 'Too Asian?' article published by Canada's premiere news magazine in 2010 as a case study of media and education in order to produce a sharper analytical grammar of race in liberal, multicultural societies. I argue that the article recycles racial stereotypes, perpetuates the normalization of whiteness and the mythology of meritocracy, and enacts irresponsible journalism. I situate its representation of Asians within a historical context, and delineate their paradoxical subjectivity as an un/wanted racialized minority group. Asians are desired as immigrants, workers and students when they benefit Canada's economic imperatives, but are disavowed when they challenge the sociocultural status quo. I also develop the concept of ethno-nationalism as a form of anti-racist resistance when racialized minorities identify with the White-dominant nation-state in their claim for inclusion. However, I raise concerns regarding ethno-nationalism's limitation for pan-Asian solidarity and for the advancement of a marginalized group at the expense of another. © 2013 © 2013 Taylor & Francis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coloma, R. S. (2013). “Too Asian?” On racism, paradox and ethno-nationalism. Discourse, 34(4), 579–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.822620

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free