Attributional Complexity. An Individual Differences Measure

  • Fletcher G
  • Danilovics P
  • Fernandez G
 et al. 
  • 101


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 213


    Citations of this article.


Describes the development of a scale that measures the complexity of attributional schemata for human behavior—the Attributional Complexity Scale (ACS). In Study 1, the ACS was administered to 289 undergraduates. The results show that the ACS had adequate internal reliability and test–retest reliability, and a factor analysis yielded 1 major factor. Study 2 tested the discriminant and convergent validity of the ACS by administering it to 81 undergraduates. As predicted, attributional complexity was not related to social desirability, academic ability, or internal–external locus of control, but it was positively related to the need for cognition. Study 3 confirmed the prediction that psychology majors (n=59) would have more complex attributional schemata than natural science majors (n=35). Studies 4 and 5, with 174 Ss, provided evidence for the external validity of the scale: Attributionally complex Ss compared with attributionally simple Ss spontaneously produced more causes for personality dispositions and selected more complex causal attributions for simple behavioral events. Implications for various issues in social cognition are discussed. (48 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Garth J O Fletcher

  • Paula Danilovics

  • Guadalupe Fernandez

  • Dena Peterson

  • Glenn D. Reeder

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free