Balancing Treatment Comparisons in Longitudinal Studies

  • Marcus S
  • Siddique J
  • Ten Have T
 et al. 
  • 15


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 9


    Citations of this article.


Evaluation of treatment efficacy in psychiatric trials involves a comparison of outcomes for those who receive a treatment versus those who receive a control or comparison treatment. However, if the treatment and comparison groups are not comparable or “balanced,” observed differences in outcomes between treated and comparison groups may be due, in part, to these imbalances. In such settings, estimates of treatment efficacy may be biased unless some adjustments are made to make the groups more comparable

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Sue M. Marcus

  • Juned Siddique

  • Thomas R. Ten Have

  • Robert D. Gibbons

  • Elizabeth Stuart

  • Sharon-Lise T. Normand

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free