Best-Evidence Synthesis: An Alternative to Meta-Analytic and Traditional Reviews

  • Slavin R
  • 179


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 296


    Citations of this article.


This paper proposes an alternative to both meta-analytic and traditional reviews. The method, "best-evidence synthesis, “ combines the quantification of effect sizes and systematic study selection procedures of quantitative syntheses with the attention to individual studies and methodological and substantive issues typical of the best narrative reviews. Best-evidence syntheses focus on the "best evidence" in afield, the studies highest in internal and external validity, using well-specified and defended a priori inclusion criteria, and use effect size data as an adjunct to a full discussion of the literature being reviewed

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • R. E. Slavin

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free