Bystander response to an assault: When a man attacks a woman

121Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

From newspaper accounts it appears that when women were attacked and bystanders did not intervene, frequently the bystanders justified their inactivity by stating that they thought it was a "lovers' quarrel." In the 1st study, 51 undergraduates witnessed a violent fight between a man and a woman (confederates). Ss intervened more frequently in the fight between strangers than between a married couple. In 3 additional experiments with a total of 126 male and 98 female undergraduates who watched the fight on film, it was found that the stranger condition was perceived as being more damaging to the woman although the fights themselves were identical. The woman in the stranger condition was seen as wanting help more frequently than the married woman. In addition, the attacker was perceived as likely to run in the stranger condition and to stay and fight in the married condition. If Ss know little about the conflict, they seem likely to perceive the protagonists as dates, lovers, or married couples rather than as strangers, acquaintances, or friends. Implications for social control are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved). © 1976 American Psychological Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shotland, R. L., & Straw, M. K. (1976). Bystander response to an assault: When a man attacks a woman. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(5), 990–999. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.990

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free