Castles built on sand: Dysfunctionality in plankton models and the inadequacy of dialogue between biologists and modellers

124Citations
Citations of this article
226Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Although lip service is often paid to the involvement of modellers in the design of biological experiments and to a lesser degree to a role for biologists in construction of dynamic models, on closer examination the ultimate communication failings and associated waste of effort are all too obvious. Biologists need to work with modellers to ensure that data collected are more amenable to modelling (notably C-N-P biomass, rather than just Chl, or organism numbers), to measure the fate of non- or lesser-limiting nutrients, and the release/production of particulate and dissolved organics from organisms. Modellers should not omit representations of biological behaviour unless it is demonstrated (empirically and/or mathematically) that it is safe to do so; the performance of each part of an ecosystem model should be demonstrated as being fit for purpose and not dysfunctional. Modelling should be accepted as a research tool within biology and ecology with just as much emphasis as enjoyed by statistical and molecular methods. © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flynn, K. J. (2005, December). Castles built on sand: Dysfunctionality in plankton models and the inadequacy of dialogue between biologists and modellers. Journal of Plankton Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbi099

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free