From CBCL to DSM: A comparison of two methods to screen for DSM-IV diagnoses using CBCL data

  • Krol N
  • De Bruyn E
  • Coolen J
 et al. 
  • 23

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 41

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The screening efficiency of 2 methods to convert Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) assessment data into Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed. [DSM–IV]; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) diagnoses was compared. The Machine-Aided Diagnosis (MAD) method converts CBCL input data directly into DSM–IV symptom criteria. The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) proceeds more indirectly and uses DSM-oriented scales. The power of the 2 methods to predict DSM–IV diagnoses obtained via administration of the structured Diagnostic InterviewSchedule for Children (DISC–IV) interview in a clinical sample was examined. DISC–IV interviews and CBCL reports from parents of 44 children, 25 boys, and 19 girls, ages 6 to 17 were used. The results showed comparable levels of predictive power for the 2 methods. Both methods were able to predict DSM–IV diagnoses and therefore can be used for screening DSM–IV diagnoses.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Nicole P C M Krol

  • Eric E J De Bruyn

  • Jolanda C. Coolen

  • Edward J M Van Aarle

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free