Classifying higher education institutions in Korea: A performance-based approach

62Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to classify higher education institutions according to institutional performance rather than predetermined benchmarks. Institutional performance was defined as research performance and classified using Hierarchical Cluster Analysis, a statistical method that classifies objects according to specified classification factors. In the analysis, 47 Korean universities with doctoral programs were classified as research universities (seven universities), research active universities (14 universities), and doctoral universities (26 universities). In the detailed discussions, profiles of each group were analyzed and discussed; and, disciplinary classifications were conducted in engineering, natural science, and social science and humanities. In addition, to validate the classifications, the research performances of these categories were compared with those of U.S. peers. In the comparisons, the research performance of Korean universities was similar to that of U.S. peers. From the analysis, the classification results emerging from the performance-based approach were shown to be equivalent to that of conventional classifications using predetermined benchmarks. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shin, J. C. (2009). Classifying higher education institutions in Korea: A performance-based approach. Higher Education, 57(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9150-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free