Client variables and the behavioral treatment of recurrent tension headache: A metaanalytic review

100Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Meta-analysis revealed that in studies evaluating behavioral treatments for tension headaches, the treatment outcome has varied with the client samples (e.g., age, gender, referral source) that have been used but not with the treatment procedures (e.g., type of behavioral intervention, length of treatment, whether or not efforts were made to facilitate transfer of training) or the research designs (e.g., internal validity, explicitness of diagnostic criteria) that have been used. Mean client age proved the best predictor of treatment outcome, accounting for 30% of the outcome variance following behavior therapy. Significantly poorer outcomes have also been reported in recent studies than were reported in early studies. These findings suggest that (1) outcomes obtained with behavioral interventions have been less dependent upon the treatment variables that have been the primary focus of research attention than upon characteristics of client samples and (2) behavioral interventions may be less effective in reducing headache activity than has previously been assumed. © 1986 Plenum Publishing Corporation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Holroyd, K. A., & Penzien, D. B. (1986, December). Client variables and the behavioral treatment of recurrent tension headache: A metaanalytic review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00845282

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free