Clinical Judgmental Biases: The Moderating Roles of Counselor Cognitive Complexity and Counselor Client Preferences

53Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study found that counselor individual differences in cognitive complexity, but not preferences for client problems, moderate the cognitive processes that lead to bias in clinical judgment. A particularly robust and unambiguous clinical bias, known as diagnostic overshadowing (S. Reiss, G.W. Levitan, & J. Szysko, 1982), was selected for study. Consistent with behavior decision (R. Nisbett & L. Ross, 1980) and complexity theories (J. Bieri, A.L. Atkins, S. Briar, R.L. Leaman, H. Miller, & T. Tripodi, 1966), counseling psychologists with lower cognitive complexity were more likely to form biased clinical judgments than were counseling psychologists with higher cognitive complexity (N = 119). Implications of the significant and nonsignificant results for research in clinical judgment and for counselor education and practice are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spengler, P. M., & Strohmer, D. C. (1994). Clinical Judgmental Biases: The Moderating Roles of Counselor Cognitive Complexity and Counselor Client Preferences. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.41.1.8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free