Coenzyme Q cytoprotective mechanisms for mitochondrial complex I cytopathies involves NAD(P)H: Quinone oxidoreductase 1(NQO1)

72Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The commonest mitochondrial diseases are probably those impairing the function of complex I of the respiratory electron transport chain. Such complex I impairment may contribute to various neurodegenerative disorders e.g. Parkinson's disease. In the following, using hepatocytes as a model cell, we have shown for the first time that the cytotoxicity caused by complex I inhibition by rotenone but not that caused by complex III inhibition by antimycin can be prevented by coenzyme Q (CoQ1) or menadione. Furthermore, complex I inhibitor cytotoxicity was associated with the collapse of the mitochondrial membrane potential and reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation. ROS scavengers or inhibitors of the mitochondrial permeability transition prevented cytotoxicity. The CoQ1 cytoprotective mechanism required CoQ1 reduction by DT-diaphorase (NQO1). Furthermore, the mitochondrial membrane potential and ATP levels were restored at low CoQ1 concentrations (5 μM). This suggests that the CoQ1H2 formed by NQO1 reduced complex III and acted as an electron bypass of the rotenone block. However cytoprotection still occurred at higher CoQ1 concentrations (>10 μM), which were less effective at restoring ATP levels but readily restored the cellular cytosolic redox potential (i.e. lactate: pyruvate ratio) and prevented ROS formation. This suggests that CoQ1 or menadione cytoprotection also involves the NQO1 catalysed reoxidation of NADH that accumulates as a result of complex I inhibition. The CoQ1H2 formed would then also act as a ROS scavenger.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chan, T. S., Teng, S., Wilson, J. X., Galati, G., Khan, S., & O’Brien, P. J. (2002). Coenzyme Q cytoprotective mechanisms for mitochondrial complex I cytopathies involves NAD(P)H: Quinone oxidoreductase 1(NQO1). Free Radical Research, 36(4), 421–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10715760290021270

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free