A cognitive‐systemic reconstruction of maslow's theory of self‐actualization

85Citations
Citations of this article
362Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Maslow's need hierarchy and model of the self‐actualizing personality are reviewed and criticized. The definition of self‐actualization is found to be confusing, and the gratification of all needs is concluded to be insufficient to explain self‐actualization. Therefore the theory is reconstructed on the basis of a second‐order, cognitive‐systemic framework. A hierarchy of basic needs is derived from the urgency of perturbations which an autonomous system must compensate in order to maintain its identity. It comprises the needs for homeostasis, safety, protection, feedback and exploration. Self‐actualization is redefined as the perceived competence to satisfy these basic needs in due time. This competence has three components: material, cognitive and subjective. Material and/or cognitive incompetence during childhood create subjective incompetence, which in turn inhibits the further development of cognitive competence, and thus of self‐actualization. Copyright © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heylighen, F. (1992). A cognitive‐systemic reconstruction of maslow’s theory of self‐actualization. Behavioral Science, 37(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830370105

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free