Comments on "Chronology of Vesuvius' activity from A.D. 79 to 1631 based on archeomagnetism of lavas and historical sources" by C. Principe et al., Bull Volcanol

12Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper shortly reviews the various factors which concur to the accuracy of archaeomagnetic dating of volcanic rocks: the error on the laboratory procedure; the assumption that the archaeomagnetic direction matches the paleofield direction present when the rocks formed; the limits of the model used for dating. The very small "analytical error" claimed in the paper by Principe et al. (2004) mainly depends on their focussing on the precision of laboratory procedures, disregarding the other sources of errors, which in fact are known in the literature to be far from negligible. © Springer-Verlag 2006.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lanza, R., & Zanella, E. (2006, February). Comments on “Chronology of Vesuvius’’ activity from A.D. 79 to 1631 based on archeomagnetism of lavas and historical sources" by C. Principe et al., Bull Volcanol.” Bulletin of Volcanology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-005-0030-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free