Commuting from U.S. Brownfield and Greenfield Residential Development Neighborhoods

  • Nagengast A
  • Hendrickson C
  • Lange D
  • 19


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 0


    Citations of this article.


Whereas brownfield development is of widespread interest, there is scant literature on the environmental impacts of brownfield developments relative to conventional developments. We assembled a set of two residential brownfield and two conventional greenfield developments for a sample of {U.S.} cities including Baltimore, Chicago, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Pittsburgh, and St. Louis. Using the travel time and modes of transportation information from the 2000 {U.S.} Decennial Census, we analyzed the long-term commuting impacts from the two types of developments. Relative to greenfield development neighborhoods, we find that the brownfield development neighborhoods are closer to center cities, have higher public transportation use for commuting, comparable average travel times to work, and lower energy and greenhouse gas emissions for commuting. Future work will extend these results to consider other differential impacts of the two types of developments. {DOI:} {10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000072.} {(C)} 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Amy Nagengast

  • Chris Hendrickson

  • Deborah Lange

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free