Comparison of adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopic fluorescein angiography and offset pinhole imaging

  • Chui T
  • Dubow M
  • Pinhas A
  • et al.
43Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recent advances to the adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) have enabled finer in vivo assessment of the human retinal microvasculature. AOSLO confocal reflectance imaging has been coupled with oral fluorescein angiography (FA), enabling simultaneous acquisition of structural and perfusion images. AOSLO offset pinhole (OP) imaging combined with motion contrast post-processing techniques, are able to create a similar set of structural and perfusion images without the use of exogenous contrast agent. In this study, we evaluate the similarities and differences of the structural and perfusion images obtained by either method, in healthy control subjects and in patients with retinal vasculopathy including hypertensive retinopathy, diabetic retinopathy, and retinal vein occlusion. Our results show that AOSLO OP motion contrast provides perfusion maps comparable to those obtained with AOSLO FA, while AOSLO OP reflectance images provide additional information such as vessel wall fine structure not as readily visible in AOSLO confocal reflectance images. AOSLO OP offers a non-invasive alternative to AOSLO FA without the need for any exogenous contrast agent.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chui, T. Y. P., Dubow, M., Pinhas, A., Shah, N., Gan, A., Weitz, R., … Rosen, R. B. (2014). Comparison of adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopic fluorescein angiography and offset pinhole imaging. Biomedical Optics Express, 5(4), 1173. https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.5.001173

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free