A comparison of independent living outcomes following traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury

23Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study compares independent living outcomes in persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI). Both injuries represent life-altering events that are known to have a negative impact on independent living and are predominantly experienced by members of the same demographic group. However, the types of resultant impairments and disabilities experienced by the two populations differ substantially. The TBI participants were recruited consecutively from Canada's largest tertiary care trauma centre and followed prospectively for four years. The SCI participants were recruited via a mailed survey to members of a provincial branch of the Canadian Paraplegic Association. Independent living outcomes were measured using DeJong and Hughes' (1982) classification system of productivity status, the Reintegration to Normal Living Index, and questions on assistance from environmental supports in the form of wheelchair use and paid/unpaid personal assistance. The TBI group was found to be significantly more productive, have higher levels of satisfaction with their current experience of community integration, and use fewer environmental supports than their SCI counterparts (P≤0.0001). Methodological and demographic differences between the samples are discussed in relation to the results. The results suggest that various aspects of independent living in these two defined groups (TBI and SCI) although highly related require specific attention and that clinicians and researchers working with TBI and SCI might benefit from further collaborative efforts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harker, W. F., Dawson, D. R., Boschen, K. A., & Stuss, D. T. (2002). A comparison of independent living outcomes following traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 25(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-200206000-00003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free