Comparison of methods of interpretation of checkerboard synergy testing

  • Bonapace C
  • Bosso J
  • Friedrich L
 et al. 
  • 68

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 52

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Four different methods for interpreting the results of checkerboard synergy testing were compared by applying each to a set of synergy study data. Statistically significant differences in synergy were detected among methods (% synergy ranged from 10 to 83%). As interpretations were found to vary widely based upon method, one should be aware of this in interpreting the relevant literature. © 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Charles R. Bonapace

  • John A. Bosso

  • Lawrence V. Friedrich

  • Roger L. White

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free