Four different methods for interpreting the results of checkerboard synergy testing were compared by applying each to a set of synergy study data. Statistically significant differences in synergy were detected among methods (% synergy ranged from 10 to 83%). As interpretations were found to vary widely based upon method, one should be aware of this in interpreting the relevant literature. © 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
CITATION STYLE
Bonapace, C. R., Bosso, J. A., Friedrich, L. V., & White, R. L. (2002). Comparison of methods of interpretation of checkerboard synergy testing. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 44(4), 363–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-8893(02)00473-X
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.