Conservation, Discrimination, and Salvation: Investors' Social Concerns in the Stock Market

44Citations
Citations of this article
128Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Stocks appear to have investor clienteles based on their business practices and products. The variety in expressive benefits each individual receives from owning controversial stocks causes them to modify their portfolio to accommodate their beliefs. We examine the ownership of firms with social concerns and sin stocks (tobacco, alcohol and gambling). Women tilt their portfolios towards stocks with progressive labor policies for women and minorities. Younger investors avoid companies with poor environmental records but seek companies with progressive labor policies. Democratic voters favor stocks with progressive policies regarding women/minorities and gays/lesbians and are less likely to own sin stocks. Christian objections to homosexuality lead their members to invest less in stocks with progressive labor policies for gays and lesbians. The Christian denominations vary, though, in regard to sin stocks. Catholics are more likely while Mormons are less likely to own a sin stock relative to other investors. Socially responsible investors are clearly not all alike. Social characteristics that are important to one investor may not be important to another socially conscious investor. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hood, M., Nofsinger, J. R., & Varma, A. (2014). Conservation, Discrimination, and Salvation: Investors’ Social Concerns in the Stock Market. Journal of Financial Services Research, 45(1), 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-013-0162-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free