Controlling Market Power in Telecommunications: Antitrust vs. Sector-Specific Regulation

19Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Controlling market power is a crucial issue in a liberalised telecommunications market where incumbents usually remain dominant for some time after the opening of the market to competition. Controlling market power can be achieved through two distinct sets of rules and institutions: economy-wide antitrust rules and institutions, which have been in place in most industrialised countries for several decades, and infrastructure or sector-specific rules and institutions which have been specifically adopted to promote competition and control market power in telecommunications or in particular infrastructure sectors. In this context, the relationship between the two sets of rules and institutions becomes an issue of growing importance. Relying on a comparative analysis of five countries (the United States, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Chile, and Australia), the present book seeks to shed some light on how economy-wide and infrastructure or sector-specific components of the regulatory framework should be designed and on what the respective roles of such components should be based to maximise the efficiency of economic regulation in telecommunications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Géradin, D., & Kerf, M. (2012). Controlling Market Power in Telecommunications: Antitrust vs. Sector-Specific Regulation. Controlling Market Power in Telecommunications: Antitrust vs. Sector-Specific Regulation (pp. 1–410). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199242436.001.0001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free